{"id":878,"date":"2024-07-02T20:38:02","date_gmt":"2024-07-02T20:38:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/?post_type=cases&#038;p=878"},"modified":"2024-08-06T17:41:12","modified_gmt":"2024-08-06T17:41:12","slug":"terry-v-drummond-oklahoma-riot-statute-challenge","status":"publish","type":"cases","link":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/cases\/terry-v-drummond-oklahoma-riot-statute-challenge\/","title":{"rendered":"Terry v. Drummond Oklahoma Riot Statute Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Clinic, along with co-counsel ACLU of Oklahoma, represents several racial justice activists who were issued arrest warrants after yelling \u201cFuck the police\u201d at a police officer who drove onto the street block where the activists were painting a \u201cBlack Lives Matter\u201d mural.&nbsp; These individuals were charged with, and pleaded guilty to, riot-related offenses in connection with this speech.&nbsp; The Clinic and ACLU of Oklahoma filed a lawsuit and motion for preliminary injunction on behalf of these activists in federal court challenging Oklahoma\u2019s riot statute on First Amendment grounds.  The suit alleges that the State\u2019s definition of \u201criot\u201d is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad in violation of the First Amendment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In February 2024, the federal district court denied Plaintiffs&#8217; motion for preliminary injunction, construing the statute narrowly to comply with the First Amendment.  Plaintiffs appealed to the 10th Circuit on the issue of this narrowed construction.  Briefing is complete at the 10th Circuit and Plaintiffs are awaiting a decision and possible oral argument in their appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons aligncenter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Terry-v.-Drummond-Oklahoma-Riot-Statute-Challenge-01-Complaint.pdf\">Complaint<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons aligncenter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Terry-v.-Drummond-Oklahoma-Riot-Statute-Challenge-02-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction.pdf\">Motion for Preliminary Injunction<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons aligncenter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Terry-v.-Drummond-Oklahoma-Riot-Statute-Challenge-03-Decision-Denying-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction.pdf\">Decision Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons aligncenter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Terry-v.-Drummond-Oklahoma-Riot-Statute-Challenge-04-10th-Circuit-Motion-to-Certify.pdf\">10th Circuit Motion to Certify<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons aligncenter\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Terry-v.-Drummond-Oklahoma-Riot-Statute-Challenge-05-10th-Circuit-Appellants-Opening-Merits-Brief.pdf\">10th Circuit Appellants&#8217; Opening Merits Brief<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Clinic, along with co-counsel ACLU of Oklahoma, represents several racial justice activists who were issued arrest warrants after yelling \u201cFuck the police\u201d at a police officer who drove onto the street block where the activists were painting a \u201cBlack Lives Matter\u201d mural.&nbsp; These individuals were charged with, and pleaded guilty to, riot-related offenses in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","categories":[8],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases\/878"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/cases"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases\/878\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":905,"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cases\/878\/revisions\/905"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cornell1a.law.cornell.edu\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}